| Omega Owners Forum | |
|
https://oldsite.omegaowners.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Chat >> General Discussion Area >> swap. https://oldsite.omegaowners.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1243431230 Message started by mark mv6 on 27. May 2009 at 14:33 |
|
|
Title: swap. Post by mark mv6 on 27. May 2009 at 14:33
Anyone interested in a possible swap with mine,need a manual to lower fuel consumption,either 3.0 or 3.2.Mine is mv6 auto on an o2 plate in silver. :y
|
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by mark mv6 on 27. May 2009 at 14:37
Must be facelift though.
|
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by webby23 on 27. May 2009 at 14:38
Dont think that theres much of a difference really between manual and auto, maybe 8% at best........
If you want to save fuel costs, get a 4 pot or a Prius mate :y |
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by mark mv6 on 27. May 2009 at 14:39
Been told i will probably save upto 20% on fuel. :y
|
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by webby23 on 27. May 2009 at 14:52
Sounds a bit optimistic.
Have the later Omega sales brochure at home so can post up official figures when I get back from work tonight if you like :y :y |
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by cem on 27. May 2009 at 14:59
in a crowded start stop traffic manuals not easy but will differ more than 8 %..
today in lunch time go for shopping with a friends 1.6 toyota (auto) ..consumption was nearly same my omega :-? ;D really surprised..and the autobox was very late to change gears..think have problem with software or gear ratios.. :-/ |
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by Lazydocker on 27. May 2009 at 15:25 unlucky mark mv6 wrote on 27. May 2009 at 14:33:
I've got an LPG converted mini-facelift... Fuel economy is great when compared pricewise ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by nick v6 on 27. May 2009 at 15:28
what about swopping it with ann's honda civic 1.6
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by scottie7275 on 27. May 2009 at 15:35
Can't be as bad as my partners 1.6 auto mazda 3. She get 25 mpg avg. out of it. My 3.0 MV6 does better than that.!! :o :o
|
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by webby23 on 27. May 2009 at 20:04
Just for reference, I have checked the 2001 Omega sales brochure I have here and 3.2s are only listed in Auto.......
But as an indicator the 2.6 manuals are only around 2-4mpg better than the 2.6 autos........ :y |
|
Title: Re: swap. Post by cem on 27. May 2009 at 20:11 ScottieMV6 wrote on 27. May 2009 at 15:35:
yep.. from comparing consumption figures with friends cars the main factors are car weight, gear ratios and driving style.. otherwise roughly a 3 liter engine must consume twice the 1.6 litre engine.. but thats very far from truth.. ( although they have this capability when hammered ;D) |
|
Omega Owners Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5 AE! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved. |