I would gladly put the rope around this blanks neck and laugh loudly as he dropped.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/8354316.stm

i'll happily supply the rope >:( >:( >:(

Let me help.
I can make the noose

wrote on 11. Nov 2009 at 18:12:

I would gladly put the rope around this blanks neck and laugh loudly as he dropped. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/8354316.stm

Thats too quick, I would use techniques that are much slower and much more painful >:(

no, no, no .... he will have much more "fun" with his playmates behind bars! With any luck they will crucify him afterwards.

Nah, just burn the blank, end of! >:(

wrote on 11. Nov 2009 at 18:34:

no, no, no .... he will have much more "fun" with his playmates behind bars! With any luck they will crucify him afterwards.

2 pairs of handcuffs, attach each arm to a set of bars as wide appart as possible drop his trousers and let  the other inmates enjoy the party.

As soon as i saw the thread title i knew what the thread was about >:( >:( >:( >:(

He won't get his justice in prison, they're sectioned away from the other inmates (for their safety).

We are way too slack with this scum. Three years for a five year old that'll carry the scares for the rest of his life.
Gotta stop thinking about it now, because it gets my anger right up.

Whilst I understand the sentiments expressed above, our wonderful Government have seen fit to ensure that the punishment for crime is woefully lacking.

In the case of rape a presiding judge has to wade through all this...

http://www.sentencing-guidelines.gov.uk/docs/0000_SexualOffencesAct1.pdf

before passing sentence.

The IPP (Imprisonment for Public Protection) ruling in this case is  almost mandatory, but could easily be missed as the ONLY mention (as far as I'm aware) is para 1.26

The first parents forgave him :o :o :o :o

I would have killed him if he did that to one of my sons, quite possibly with a stake, where he used his thing which I would have removed with a blunt hacksaw.

Whilst i agree he should be tortured slowly, as a devout atheist, i struggle to understand the parents forgiveness on the grounds of thier religeous beliefs.
    How can ANYTHING be more important than the rape of a 5 year old child???? :o

Surely we have to have the death penalty for people like this. I mean is he ever going to be a productive member of society, I doubt it. He is probably going to spend the rest of his life doing this sort thing of thing, and ruining many other lives in the process.

He needs to be removed from society permanantly.  >:(

hang him by his nuts >:(

'kin ell, he's only 16, must have a seriously warped mind to start so early. I'd strangle the f****r with my own hands if he did that to my child

Strangling would be over too quickly for this sad pathetic individual.Bring back slower more meaningful punishments like they still have in the Isle of Man.Their population understands what they will get if they do wrong,no pussy footing around due to 'human rights' it is much simpler,you do wrong you lose your rights.Stuff the p.c. brigade up their own arses.

Your all wrong.....a good public stoning, its a game for all the family.

Tie the blank to a merry go round by the nuts.  >:(

Guffer wrote on 11. Nov 2009 at 18:31:

wrote on 11. Nov 2009 at 18:12: I would gladly put the rope around this blanks neck and laugh loudly as he dropped. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/8354316.stm Thats too quick, I would use techniques that are much slower and much more painful >:(

If we get the people responsible who released him after his first rape, we'd have enough guinea pig material to be trying different things for months.

A worrying development for me was to hear that he was given a light sentence for his first offence because he suffers from aspergers. My son suffers too, but is totally unique, of course. The trouble is, if aspergers keeps receiving bad publicity then people will associate it with criminal behaviour, when nothing could be further from the truth.

An aspergers sufferer is no more likely to offend than any 'normal' person.

Pete. wrote on 11. Nov 2009 at 20:00:

As soon as i saw the thread title i knew what the thread was about >:( >:( >:( >:( He won't get his justice in prison, they're sectioned away from the other inmates (for their safety). We are way too slack with this scum. Three years for a five year old that'll carry the scares for the rest of his life. Gotta stop thinking about it now, because it gets my anger right up.

same here, my blood boils when i read about these pathetic soft sentences. but more that these judges give them these sentences.  >:( >:(

Richie London wrote on 12. Nov 2009 at 16:50:

Pete. wrote on 11. Nov 2009 at 20:00: As soon as i saw the thread title i knew what the thread was about >:( >:( >:( >:( He won't get his justice in prison, they're sectioned away from the other inmates (for their safety). We are way too slack with this scum. Three years for a five year old that'll carry the scares for the rest of his life. Gotta stop thinking about it now, because it gets my anger right up. same here, my blood boils when i read about these pathetic soft sentences. but more that these judges give them these sentences.  >:( >:(

Please get facts correct  :) 

Judges hands are tied by Nulabor and the sentencing guidelines ...  eg .. if someone pleads "guilty" they will automatically get a 50% reduction in sentence ... and as ALL prisoners (unless on IPP) only serve 50% of sentence .. this means a guilty plea will mean you serve 25% of what the "guidline" is .....

I've already posted a link to the guidlines on Sexual Offences ... have a read and just see what a "young offender"can actually be given ... it's pathetic ... but blame the correct people .... politicians .. not judges ... generally.

I am a bit confused,  I understood that he now has an indefinite sentence..................

Vamps wrote on 12. Nov 2009 at 22:44:

I am a bit confused,  I understood that he now has an indefinite sentence..................

He has been given an IPP - Imprisonment for Public Protection - which just means his case is reviewed in a different manner - non-IPP prisoners are automatically released after serving 50% of sentence and placed on "licence". An IPP prisoner will be REVIEWED at the 50% point and a further decision made, if still considered a danger then they are not released.

It is that element which makes the sentence "indefinite" - most folks think "indefinite" means "forever" ... in prison terms it really means "non-defined".

The sentencing guidelines REQUIRE a judge to give a full sentence as that then defines the 50% point even when giving an IPP as that decides the "point of review".

HTH

Entwood wrote on 12. Nov 2009 at 17:01:

Richie London wrote on 12. Nov 2009 at 16:50: Pete. wrote on 11. Nov 2009 at 20:00: As soon as i saw the thread title i knew what the thread was about >:( >:( >:( >:( He won't get his justice in prison, they're sectioned away from the other inmates (for their safety). We are way too slack with this scum. Three years for a five year old that'll carry the scares for the rest of his life. Gotta stop thinking about it now, because it gets my anger right up. same here, my blood boils when i read about these pathetic soft sentences. but more that these judges give them these sentences. >:( >:( Please get facts correct  :)  Judges hands are tied by Nulabor and the sentencing guidelines ...  eg .. if someone pleads "guilty" they will automatically get a 50% reduction in sentence ... and as ALL prisoners (unless on IPP) only serve 50% of sentence .. this means a guilty plea will mean you serve 25% of what the "guidline" is ..... I've already posted a link to the guidlines on Sexual Offences ... have a read and just see what a "young offender"can actually be given ... it's pathetic ... but blame the correct people .... politicians .. not judges ... generally.

Agreed, we should all be able to recognise how the political will can over-ride the judicial process by studying recent history within these British Isles.

Just throw the scummy **** into a room full of mothers and leave them for a couple of hours, then black bag "it's" remains and burn them  :y Job done and saved us all a lot of money as well  :y

Stevie-blunder wrote on 13. Nov 2009 at 19:41:

Just throw the scummy **** into a room full of mothers and leave them for a couple of hours, then black bag "it's" remains and burn them  :y Job done and saved us all a lot of money as well  :y

That is sexism - Dads would want to join in as well