| Omega Owners Forum | |
|
https://oldsite.omegaowners.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Chat >> General Discussion Area >> Vectra 2.2 Direct https://oldsite.omegaowners.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1258470513 Message started by STMO123 on 17. Nov 2009 at 15:08 |
|
|
Title: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by STMO123 on 17. Nov 2009 at 15:08
Just been down to EH. There's a lovely veccy 2.2 there, spotless and very reasonable. As I was talking to the salesman something was going through my head about the 2.2.....couldn't quite remember.
So I came home and had a look on 'tinternet, then I remembered: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/watchdog/2009/01/vauxhall_cars_that_suddenly_lo.html Back to the drawing board. |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by tunnie on 17. Nov 2009 at 15:50
we have 2 x 2.2's and both did 100k easy, mines on 128k and not missed a beat!
|
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by Marks DTM Calib on 17. Nov 2009 at 15:55
I looked into this one earlier in the year (just before I bought the bus).
Some interesing extra info I got was: All occurances were in a local area or linked to the South East. It was affecting other cars from many different manufacturers, thes were also in that region. Yu can draw an inference from those findings! So nowt to really worry about i would say! |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by Marks DTM Calib on 17. Nov 2009 at 15:56 tunnie wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 15:50:
A TOTALY different power unit.....absolutely nothing in common |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by STMO123 on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:04 Marks DTM Calib wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 15:55:
Cheers Mark. It's a 2005 54 SXi estate, 50,000 miles not a mark on it inside or out. They want £4820 but I might be able to wangle something off. Reckon I'd get £2750 for my meriva, so £2000 to pay, maybe :-/ |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by tunnie on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:10 Marks DTM Calib wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 15:56:
I thought it was just chain rather than belt :-/ :-[ :-[ |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by cruisetopoland on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:17
Agree a part-ex deal with a separate cash deal on the invoice in case you can sell privately and don't need to part-ex.
Get the Meriva valeted and park it somewhere very busy (supermarkets by the door are FAB for cars up to 3k!) during the time between you order the Vectra and collect it. Simple ads work best-age, mileage, tax band, ins grp, extras, history. I have sold a few this way and sweetened the deal by £400-500 by selling privately and doing a cash deal on the new one. If you are worried about a particular defect, make sure this defect is absolutely covered under any warranty offered, or get the garage write an additional note to say that it will be covered. PS-do you like the Vectra auto-indicator stalks????? I HATE them. Cheers :y |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by STMO123 on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:31 cruisetopoland wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:17:
Been considering a private sale. Reckon I could get £3500 for the meriva that way. But.............I'm a lazy blank ;D ;D Ref the indicator stalk..wifeys astra has it and it is annoying, but not enough to put me off. |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by cruisetopoland on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:42 wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:31:
There's millions of Vectras about, so sell privately first if poss and go in hard on a private deal and buy a nice OAP owned Veccy estate on the cheap.... :y Have heard about issues with 2.2 Vectras-see: http://www.carsurvey.org/reviews/vauxhall/vectra/r107929/ amongst others :y |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by cruisetopoland on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:47
Saying that, though-does not seem too many issues over that mileage.
I thought these 2.2 directs had coil and stem seal issues, or am I wrong? |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by MickAP on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:21 cruisetopoland wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:17:
And get it all bashed up by those uncaring shoppers, with their trolleys or kids opening the doors onto it [smiley=undecided.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by Marks DTM Calib on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:22 wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:31:
Once you get used to them, they are brilliant! |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by STMO123 on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:30 Marks DTM Calib wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:22:
They are fine in most situations. I keep indicating in the opposite direction when I have to cancel manually. :o |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by Marks DTM Calib on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:31 wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:30:
Like I said, you get used to it.....and the 3 flash setup gets used a lot (can be increased to 5 with T2) or the half press and hold. I hated them at first but, now they are just second nature |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by Marks DTM Calib on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:32 tunnie wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 16:10:
I thought it was just chain rather than belt :-/ :-[ :-[/quote] Totaly different....different block (alloy as well), different head (inlet and exhaust on opposite sides to the Omega unit)....etc, etc, etc |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by STMO123 on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:41
Here it is. Got the year wrong :-[
http://www.evanshalshaw.com/vehiclesearch/used/vauxhall-used-car-ky54jzj.html?qs=false&type=1 |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by Marks DTM Calib on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:42
Evans Halshaw.....RUNAWAY!!!!
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by cem on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:07
stay away.. if you dont want to spend your money for endless repairs, go buy something proper..Toyota or Honda..
|
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by LSG 1 on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:08 Marks DTM Calib wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 17:31:
Same here with the van, like them a lot now, only use the 3 flashes one makes it much easier :) |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by Marks DTM Calib on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:13 cem wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:07:
Nothing wrong with Vectra C's cem....now Vectra B, thats a different story! |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by cem on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:21
from honest john
"2.2 16v petrol engine has been known to snap its timing chain due to the lubrication jet becoming blocked, possibly as a result of running on dirty oil due to extended oil change intervals. Vauxhall Z22SE 2.2 litre engine was modified from March 2002, engine number 11065400, to overcome the timing chain lubrication problem. The problem was caused by an undersized oil spray nozzle which got blocked, starving the timing chain of oil. If the timing chain problem has been subsequently rectified, a modified `bolt' is fitted, with `nicks' on the corners of the hexagon. Ignition control unit of 2.2 petrol engine is prone to burning out. " and I'm sure there are also electrical niggles .. galeries around my job area sell them for comparingly low prices ..personally they wont be my choice.. :( |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by LSG 1 on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:24 cem wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:21:
March 2002 just before the new Vectra came out :y |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by cem on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:27 Marks DTM Calib wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:13:
I think there are more refined and faultless cars that money can be spent.. :-/ |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by cem on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:28 Del Boy wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:24:
http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/carbycar/index.htm?md=526 |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by LSG 1 on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:33 cem wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:28:
Meaning not many with that issue and most were very early cars too. |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by cem on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:35 Del Boy wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:33:
I hope so :-/ :y |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by LSG 1 on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:40 cem wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:35:
Pretty certain it was mate :y |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by Marks DTM Calib on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:23 cem wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 18:27:
Lol, well neither the Toyota or the Honda fit that category.....although its fair to say that the SXi will have a harder suspension setup. |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by TheBoy on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:35
Not a massive fan of Vectra-C - quite a firm ride, which plays my back up a bit, but not uncomfortable (if you avoid the sporty ones). Its fine with smaller engines, but the more powerful ones show how horribly bad the setup is. I have frequently toyed with buying (a small engined) one though.
As MDTM says, its a million times better than the horrific Vectra-B. Myself, if I wanted a large family boring car, I'd probably get (and it pains me to say this) the Mundaneo - I find it more comfortable, certain handles better, and the engines are mostly better. |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by tunnie on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:37 TheBoy wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:35:
Fords always were comfy, we used Addison Lee for cars in London. The VW Sharans where feking crap, rock hard seats. The Galaxy was much, MUCH better. I do like the new Mondeo, but not cheap enough yet |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by Marks DTM Calib on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:42 TheBoy wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:35:
The engines arn't, the diesels are woeful and sadly the petrols not much better. They are a bit harsh on the ride but a much better chassis.....not as well screwed together though. |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by TheBoy on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:51 Marks DTM Calib wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:42:
Its a subjective thing, but I reckon the tdci is smoother than the cdti, and certainly seems to pull better (imagine cars are similarish weight). The v6 petrol mondeo certainly lays its power down more gracefully than the v6 vectra. Not driven a small petrol engined mundaneo to comment, but i4 petrol vectras are pretty naff. of the hire cars I've had, both mondeo and veccy-c have been robust. In fact, electrical issues aside, all modern fords seem robust - more so than (particularly) astra-h where trim keeps falling off. |
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by TheBoy on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:52
oh yes, I'm a big fan of the lane changer indicators :y - miss them on the omega :(
|
|
Title: Re: Vectra 2.2 Direct Post by STMO123 on 17. Nov 2009 at 20:03 TheBoy wrote on 17. Nov 2009 at 19:35:
There was a mondeo ghia estate there, same year, £2000 more :( |
|
Omega Owners Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5 AE! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved. |