Omega Owners Forum
https://oldsite.omegaowners.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Chat >> General Discussion Area >> Graham Norton
https://oldsite.omegaowners.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1258911341

Message started by tunnie on 22. Nov 2009 at 17:35

Title: Graham Norton
Post by tunnie on 22. Nov 2009 at 17:35
Got a formal warning for this:

http://www.youtube.com/v/eU2FGiFUbu0

Some people really need to get out more, cause i thought it was bl00dy funny  ;D

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Holy Count on 22. Nov 2009 at 18:03
What was the warning for ?  Bad mouthing a hair do ?

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by AmigoMV6 on 22. Nov 2009 at 18:24
Once again trash tv. It's not funny, not offensive but not funny. How can a P O O F a fat ugly bird & a no mark yank be considered entertainment?
     It's really beyond me. You're an intelligent successful bloke Mark, get a grip FFS!!!! ::) :)

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Taxi Driver on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:05
Well, i thought it was funny, but then i used to watch the Graham Norton shows. I also used to like watching Dom Jollie of Trigger Happy TV fame  :y

Incidently, I took Dom Jollie to London a month or so ago....as he lives not far from Swindon  :y

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by TheBoy on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:16
Can't stand the twerp, tries to be funny, but no comic timing....

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Debs. on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:28

TheBoy wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:16:
Can't stand the twerp, tries to be funny, but no comic timing....


....so, would that make him 'gay' then? ;D

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by tunnie on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:39
i don't really like him either, the warning was that it would 'offend lesbians' just annoys me you can hardly say anything now, without someone complaining.

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by davethediver on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:44

tunnie wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:39:
i don't really like him either, the warning was that it would 'offend lesbians' just annoys me you can hardly say anything now, without someone complaining.


Thats just the UK all over :(

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Holy Count on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:55

tunnie wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:39:
i don't really like him either, the warning was that it would 'offend lesbians' just annoys me you can hardly say anything now, without someone complaining.



Heh heh --- I got into hot water a while back with my ex ( who sports a funny hairstyle these days!). We were walking along the street and she pointed out a leather clad, short haired female walking towards us as one of here new friends and asked me what I thought  ::)  My reply was that I thought she looked like a "screaming d**e" --- unfortunately I was overheard and heavily berated. My response was "But, she IS a screaming d**e!" .... can't bl**dy win!!

Anyways -- nothing he said should have given offence. Sheesh, I am an overweight, bearded, baldy old git who likes rock music and is slightly disabled ---- nobody on TV could say anything without touching on one of my deficiencies --- but do the management spring to my defence ?? Erm ... nope.

Another example of people with no lives trying to impinge on those that do.

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by jerry on 22. Nov 2009 at 23:22
paraphrasing Rowan Atkinson (again) ;"it is more important to have the right to offend than to be offended". Where would comedy be if there were no butts for the jokes? Besides, surely comedy only works if there is actually more than a grain of truth in what it says...and I'd probably go further and argue that a country's tolerance of satire is an indication of how free its citizens can be. Ah well, getting too serious now....and all over some gay Irish feller whose finest hour was probably as the priest who was desperate to show how young and hip he was in that episode of Father Ted

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by cruisetopoland on 22. Nov 2009 at 23:28
I think if you listen to this type of entertainment, you will be aware it could be "edgy"

Graham Norton has been covering Steve Wright on Radio2 last week and although I onced found him mildly amusing at times, last week Radio2 just made me shudder-it was uncomfortably poor!

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Andy B on 22. Nov 2009 at 23:37

cruisetopoland wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 23:28:
.......
Graham Norton has been covering Steve Wright on Radio2 last week and although I onced found him mildly amusing at times, last week Radio2 just made me shudder-it was uncomfortably poor!


Not a 'Brown Hatter' (ex matelots might understand  ::)) I've ever liked ..... especially standing in for Steve Wright. Fortunately I missed most of his shows ..... TV & radio  ::)

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Vamps on 23. Nov 2009 at 00:22

Andy B wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 23:37:

cruisetopoland wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 23:28:
.......
Graham Norton has been covering Steve Wright on Radio2 last week and although I onced found him mildly amusing at times, last week Radio2 just made me shudder-it was uncomfortably poor!


Not a 'Brown Hatter' (ex matelots might understand  ::)) I've ever liked ..... especially standing in for Steve Wright. Fortunately I missed most of his shows ..... TV & radio  ::)


Us Ganges Boys understand........ ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Turk on 23. Nov 2009 at 00:33

jerry wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 23:22:
paraphrasing Rowan Atkinson (again) ;"it is more important to have the right to offend than to be offended". Where would comedy be if there were no butts for the jokes? Besides, surely comedy only works if there is actually more than a grain of truth in what it says...and I'd probably go further and argue that a country's tolerance of satire is an indication of how free its citizens can be. Ah well, getting too serious now....and all over some gay Irish feller whose finest hour was probably as the priest who was desperate to show how young and hip he was in that episode of Father Ted


Doing the River Dance...in a caravan  ;D  :y

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by RichieRich on 23. Nov 2009 at 07:39

tunnie wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:39:
i don't really like him either, the warning was that it would 'offend lesbians' just annoys me you can hardly say anything now, without someone complaining.


people take offence at the slightest bit of banter.i called a young woman a rug hugger in the pub as a joke and im not to popular amongst the pesketarians now.  ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by cam2502 on 23. Nov 2009 at 09:25
agree with tb, cant stand the guy......but he shouldnt have had a awrning for that.

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by KillerWatt on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:21

Amigo MX5 wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 18:24:
Once again trash tv. It's not funny, not offensive but not funny. How can a P O O F a fat ugly bird & a no mark yank be considered entertainment?
     It's really beyond me. You're an intelligent successful bloke Mark, get a grip FFS!!!! ::) :)

And people wonder why the world is so f*cked up when there are still 1000's who are prepared to start the mouth before engaging the brain  ::) ::)

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by STMO123 on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:26

Debs. wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:28:

TheBoy wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:16:
Can't stand the twerp, tries to be funny, but no comic timing....


....so, would that make him 'gay' then? ;D



What is it with the gay word. He's homosexual.

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Martin Imber on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:28

wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:21:

Amigo MX5 wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 18:24:
Once again trash tv. It's not funny, not offensive but not funny. How can a P O O F a fat ugly bird & a no mark yank be considered entertainment?
     It's really beyond me. You're an intelligent successful bloke Mark, get a grip FFS!!!! ::) :)

And people wonder why the world is so f*cked up when there are still 1000's who are prepared to start the mouth before engaging the brain  ::) ::)



Not sure who these were but if Dawn French - well she can be funny.

GN - not a fan.

I think the point is the P in front of forum initials is famous for what he is not what he does.

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Holy Count on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:28

wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:26:

Debs. wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:28:

TheBoy wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:16:
Can't stand the twerp, tries to be funny, but no comic timing....


....so, would that make him 'gay' then? ;D



What is it with the gay word. He's homosexual.


He could be a happy homosexual  ::)

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Martin Imber on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:28

wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:26:

Debs. wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:28:

TheBoy wrote on 22. Nov 2009 at 19:16:
Can't stand the twerp, tries to be funny, but no comic timing....


....so, would that make him 'gay' then? ;D



What is it with the gay word. He's homosexual.



I don't care what he is - is he funny - not very

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by KillerWatt on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:31

Martin Imber wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:28:
I think the point is the P in front of forum initials is famous for what he is not what he does.

It's not the "poof" word that gets on my tits Martin, it's the context that some (obvious) neanderthals are using it in that gets up my nose mate.

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Martin Imber on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:41

wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:31:

Martin Imber wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:28:
I think the point is the P in front of forum initials is famous for what he is not what he does.

It's not the "poof" word that gets on my tits Martin, it's the context that some (obvious) neanderthals are using it in that gets up my nose mate.



I call them what they are if I need to - I use the offical term - gay means happy!

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by STMO123 on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:42

Martin Imber wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:41:

wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:31:

Martin Imber wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:28:
I think the point is the P in front of forum initials is famous for what he is not what he does.

It's not the "poof" word that gets on my tits Martin, it's the context that some (obvious) neanderthals are using it in that gets up my nose mate.



I call them what they are if I need to - I use the offical term - gay means happy!



You mean the English language.

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Martin Imber on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:43
I think it is lack of education or no exposure.

But I think the extremists have made it worse for the ordinary homosexual

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by STMO123 on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:44

Martin Imber wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:43:
I think it is lack of education or no exposure.

But I think the extremists have made it worse for the ordinary homosexual



Peter Tatchell springs to mind. You could be the most tolerant person in the world, but that blank would soon turn you anti.

Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by KillerWatt on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:48

wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:44:

Martin Imber wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:43:
I think it is lack of education or no exposure.

But I think the extremists have made it worse for the ordinary homosexual



Peter Tatchell springs to mind. You could be the most tolerant person in the world, but that blank would soon turn you anti.

Spot on Steve  :y


Title: Re: Graham Norton
Post by Martin Imber on 23. Nov 2009 at 21:55

wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:44:

Martin Imber wrote on 23. Nov 2009 at 20:43:
I think it is lack of education or no exposure.

But I think the extremists have made it worse for the ordinary homosexual



Peter Tatchell springs to mind. You could be the most tolerant person in the world, but that blank would soon turn you anti.



Exactly - I can't stand that pillock >:( >:(

Omega Owners Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5 AE!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.