This is the old site. Please use the new site.

  Welcome, Guest. Please Login
Omega Owners Forum
 
  Home Shop Help Search Members Login  
 

This is the old site. Please use the new site.

www.omegaowners.com/forum/index.php.

 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
3.0 v3.2 (Read 2971 times)
Del Boy
Omega Lord
*******
Offline



Posts: 9381
Ashford, Kent.
Gender: male

Drives: Various things.
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #15 - 12. Dec 2009 at 22:36
 
Andy B wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:25:
Del Boy wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:23:
Andy B wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:21:
Del Boy wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:19:
Brick Tamland wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:18:
Andy H wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:16:
secondary air injection.

Blows air into the exhaust manifolds during warm up to help the catalytic converters warm up more quickly.


What are they Roll Eyes

Something you don't have  Wink


Doh! [img] I've missed something!  Roll Eyes Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up!

I do frequently, comes with age  Grin


I know!   Sad Sad Sad

Where am I?
Who am I?                  Wink

Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Drives: 2007 '57' BMW 730Ld in Black Sapphire, 2010 '10' Vauxhall Astra Van Sportive SE VXS Seward Edition in Sapphire Black.
 
IP Logged
 
Amigo MX5
Omega King
********
Offline


Now doing hair & beauty
treatments!!!!!

Posts: 13743
Immingham N.E Lincs.
Gender: male

Drives: TOPLESS!!!!!
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #16 - 12. Dec 2009 at 22:38
 
My car "should" have two catalytic converters but i decided they were expensive & could cause the car to stop/limp mode?, fail mot on emissions....
    So i fecked 'em off. No condoms on my car! Cool Cheesy
Back to top
 

Official OOF MX5 GAYBOY!!!
 
IP Logged
 
PhilRich
Omega Lord
*******
Offline


Proud to be English, with
no apologies to ANYONE!

Posts: 6825
NorthEast Coast
Gender: male

Drives: 2002 2.2CDX 4dr Auto. LPG Converted.
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #17 - 12. Dec 2009 at 22:40
 
Amigo MX5 wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:38:
My car "should" have two catalytic converters but i decided they were expensive & could cause the car to stop/limp mode?, fail mot on emissions....
    So i fecked 'em off. No condoms on my car! Cool Cheesy



Forgive me for sounding being ignorant, but I thought cat equipped cars had to have them fitted to pass the MOT? Huh
Back to top
 

Apparently the Skipper said "Hard a Port!" but I went to Starboard, 'cos i'm Hard a Hearin'!
...
 
IP Logged
 
Brick Tamland
Intermediate Member
***
Offline


Good one!

Posts: 441
Dublin
Gender: male

Drives: '95 xj sport 4.0
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #18 - 12. Dec 2009 at 22:42
 
PhilRich wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:40:
Amigo MX5 wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:38:
My car "should" have two catalytic converters but i decided they were expensive & could cause the car to stop/limp mode?, fail mot on emissions....
    So i fecked 'em off. No condoms on my car! Cool Cheesy



Forgive me for sounding being ignorant, but I thought cat equipped cars had to have them fitted to pass the MOT? Huh


Only 4 bolts +20 mins Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Saving for one! All donations welcome, ask for details.
...
 
IP Logged
 
PhilRich
Omega Lord
*******
Offline


Proud to be English, with
no apologies to ANYONE!

Posts: 6825
NorthEast Coast
Gender: male

Drives: 2002 2.2CDX 4dr Auto. LPG Converted.
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #19 - 12. Dec 2009 at 22:45
 
Ah, gotcha now Thumbs Up! Grin
Back to top
 

Apparently the Skipper said "Hard a Port!" but I went to Starboard, 'cos i'm Hard a Hearin'!
...
 
IP Logged
 
Andy H
Omega Knight
*****
Offline



Posts: 1833
Cornwall
Gender: male

Drives: 03 2.6 Elite Auto
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #20 - 12. Dec 2009 at 22:59
 
PhilRich wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:40:
Amigo MX5 wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:38:
My car "should" have two catalytic converters but i decided they were expensive & could cause the car to stop/limp mode?, fail mot on emissions....
    So i fecked 'em off. No condoms on my car! Cool Cheesy



Forgive me for sounding being ignorant, but I thought cat equipped cars had to have them fitted to pass the MOT? Huh


Don't quote me but....

I don't think cats were compulsory before 2000 so if you have a 1990's car you can 'de-cat' the car by fitting a straight through down pipe.

I am not totally sure of the cut off date. My 1972 Range Rover emission test is 'no excessive visible smoke from exhaust' (or something like that). The MOT takes half as long as it does for the Omega  Roll Eyes

If you look at your last MOT emissions results you should be able to tell if the criteria require a cat to pass.
Back to top
 

Previous vehicles: Viva, Chevette, Astra mk2, Carlton mk1, Astra mk2, Land Rover SerIII, Carlton Mk2, Range Rover, Omega 2.5 V6
"Deja Moo - The feeling that you've heard this bull somewhere before."
 
IP Logged
 
Amigo MX5
Omega King
********
Offline


Now doing hair & beauty
treatments!!!!!

Posts: 13743
Immingham N.E Lincs.
Gender: male

Drives: TOPLESS!!!!!
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #21 - 12. Dec 2009 at 23:03
 
Yes a de catted car won't pass the emissions test come mot time.
    As the old saying goes it's not what you know but who.....nuff said. Cool Thumbs Up!
Back to top
 

Official OOF MX5 GAYBOY!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Albs
Omega King
********
Offline


The upgrades are ongoing.

Posts: 15083
North Essex
Gender: male

Drives: 2000 2.5CD with LPG/Honda cbr600 FX
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #22 - 12. Dec 2009 at 23:06
 
Andy B wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:35:
Brick Tamland wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:32:
Del Boy wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:19:
Brick Tamland wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:18:
Andy H wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:16:
secondary air injection.

Blows air into the exhaust manifolds during warm up to help the catalytic converters warm up more quickly.


What are they Roll Eyes

Something you don't have  Wink


All the better for it. Sounds great Cool


I can't say my Senator sounded better or performend any better when the cats were sat in the shed & my stainless de-cat pipes were fitted. It was a lot easier to fit/remove on that cat though.  Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Up!

Thats because it was a better car altogether Andy. Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up!





Here we go again Cheesy Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Breaking - facelift 2.5 Elite.in Z20H Blue. PM your parts requirements.
 
IP Logged
 
Andy B
Over Active Poster
*********
Offline



Posts: 21988
Bury Lancs
Gender: male

Drives: 1999 3.0 Elite auto/TDM
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #23 - 12. Dec 2009 at 23:07
 
Andy H wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:59:
.....
I am not totally sure of the cut off dat .....


K reg! All Most cars Kreg onwards require cats for an MOT test .... unless you know someone  Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Up!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Albs
Omega King
********
Offline


The upgrades are ongoing.

Posts: 15083
North Essex
Gender: male

Drives: 2000 2.5CD with LPG/Honda cbr600 FX
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #24 - 12. Dec 2009 at 23:08
 
Andy H wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:59:
PhilRich wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:40:
Amigo MX5 wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:38:
My car "should" have two catalytic converters but i decided they were expensive & could cause the car to stop/limp mode?, fail mot on emissions....
    So i fecked 'em off. No condoms on my car! Cool Cheesy



Forgive me for sounding being ignorant, but I thought cat equipped cars had to have them fitted to pass the MOT? Huh


Don't quote me but....

I don't think cats were compulsory before 2000 so if you have a 1990's car you can 'de-cat' the car by fitting a straight through down pipe.

I am not totally sure of the cut off date. My 1972 Range Rover emission test is 'no excessive visible smoke from exhaust' (or something like that). The MOT takes half as long as it does for the Omega  Roll Eyes

If you look at your last MOT emissions results you should be able to tell if the criteria require a cat to pass.

I think its earlier,around 1993. Wink
Back to top
 

Breaking - facelift 2.5 Elite.in Z20H Blue. PM your parts requirements.
 
IP Logged
 
Andy B
Over Active Poster
*********
Offline



Posts: 21988
Bury Lancs
Gender: male

Drives: 1999 3.0 Elite auto/TDM
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #25 - 12. Dec 2009 at 23:09
 
Albs wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 23:06:
.......
Thats because it was a better car altogether Andy. Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up!





Here we go again Cheesy Grin Grin Grin


Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin  Thumbs Up!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Andy B
Over Active Poster
*********
Offline



Posts: 21988
Bury Lancs
Gender: male

Drives: 1999 3.0 Elite auto/TDM
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #26 - 12. Dec 2009 at 23:10
 
Albs wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 23:08:
......
I think its earlier,around 1993. Wink


1st Aug 1992  Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Up!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Amigo MX5
Omega King
********
Offline


Now doing hair & beauty
treatments!!!!!

Posts: 13743
Immingham N.E Lincs.
Gender: male

Drives: TOPLESS!!!!!
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #27 - 12. Dec 2009 at 23:12
 
Stick the pipe up another car that's just passed...sorted! Cool
Back to top
 

Official OOF MX5 GAYBOY!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Tony H
Omega Baron
******
Offline



Posts: 4164
liverpool
Gender: male

Drives: 2.5 ELITE
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #28 - 12. Dec 2009 at 23:13
 
Albs wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 23:08:
Andy H wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:59:
PhilRich wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:40:
Amigo MX5 wrote on 12. Dec 2009 at 22:38:
My car "should" have two catalytic converters but i decided they were expensive & could cause the car to stop/limp mode?, fail mot on emissions....
    So i fecked 'em off. No condoms on my car! Cool Cheesy



Forgive me for sounding being ignorant, but I thought cat equipped cars had to have them fitted to pass the MOT? Huh


Don't quote me but....

I don't think cats were compulsory before 2000 so if you have a 1990's car you can 'de-cat' the car by fitting a straight through down pipe.

I am not totally sure of the cut off date. My 1972 Range Rover emission test is 'no excessive visible smoke from exhaust' (or something like that). The MOT takes half as long as it does for the Omega  Roll Eyes

If you look at your last MOT emissions results you should be able to tell if the criteria require a cat to pass.

I think its earlier,around 1993. Wink

Anything after 1990 H reg had to have cats fitted
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tunnie
Over Active Poster
*********
Offline



Posts: 22520
London, W3
Gender: male

Drives: 2.2 CD (LPG'd) & BMW R1200 GS
Re: 3.0 v3.2
Reply #29 - 12. Dec 2009 at 23:18
 
i'd take the 3.2 due to the DBW stuff, the 'go' pedal is so much lighter to the touch, the old cable driven ones need a fair bit of weight on them.
Back to top
 

Do you break V6's as often as TheBoy? Then you need tunnie's towing services, recovery costs are just the humiliation of being towed by 2/3's of an engine
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print

This is the old site. Please use the new site.