12. Feb 2026 at 03:06

	Welcome, Guest. Please Login

Shop

Help

Members

This is the old site. Please use the new site.

www.omegaowners.com/forum/index.php.

Omega Owners Forum › Chat › General Discussion Area › only in britain and under labour

(Moderators: hotel21, Auto Addict, Darth Loo-knee, TheBoy, Marks DTM Calib)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 2 3

only in britain and under labour (Read 1744 times)

Pete Elite

Omega Knight

Offline

Posts: 1903
Uxbridge, Middlesex
Gender: male

Drives: 30L Elite Auto Saloon(96)

Re: only in britain and under labour
Reply #30 - 23. Dec 2009 at 01:38

Desperate Den wrote on 22. Dec 2009 at 11:05:

Pete Elite wrote on 22. Dec 2009 at 01:22:

Entwood wrote on 21. Dec 2009 at 19:34:

How in anyones mind does chasing someone down the road, tripping them up, then smacking them in the head with a cricket bat even come close to "self defence" ???

The guy lost it and went OTT. I excuse him losing it due to what he had just gone through, but he acted as judge, jury, and very nearly, executioner.

Simply not allowed. Vigilante behaviour NOT self defence.

His actions were wholly disproportionate .. ie unreasonable

And that is what he was done for. Simple really.

I'm sorry Entwood but if you really believe what you've written then I'm sad to say there's no hope for this world and the criminal element and snivelling gutless PC brigade will have all us law abiding people looking over our shoulders waiting to be the next crime statistic's page filler!!!

Do you have a solution to this very difficult problem Pete?

Yes Zulu but unfortunately the criminal scumbags won't like it Grin

IP Logged

Pete Elite

Omega Knight

Offline

Posts: 1903
Uxbridge, Middlesex
Gender: male

Drives: 30L Elite Auto Saloon(96)

Re: only in britain and under labour
Reply #31 - 23. Dec 2009 at 02:03

Entwood wrote on 22. Dec 2009 at 16:46:

Pete Elite wrote on 22. Dec 2009 at 01:22:

Entwood wrote on 21. Dec 2009 at 19:34:

His actions were wholly disproportionate .. ie unreasonable

And that is what he was done for. Simple really.

That is the whole point .. he did NOT abide by the law .. he took it into his own hands when he wacked the guy with a cricket bat 100 yards down the road. If he had obeyed the law and stopped the guy with "reasonable force" he would not be in prison.

Quite frankly with what he and his family had been put through i don't as should have the jury think reasonable force comes into it and he was doing society a huge favour deleting this piece of worthless shite from it!!!
I know that the law is the law but when in Gods name are these antiquated laws and the subsequent punishments for breaking them going to be brought into the 21st century Angry

.

Rant over Lips Sealed

.

BTW Entwood i have to agree with what you say because unfortunately that's how the laws such as they are stand today but hopefully for all our sakes,

not for much longer

.

Merry Christmas,
Pete

IP Logged

Pages: 1 2 3

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

This is the old site. Please use the new site.

« Home

‹ Board

Top of this page