http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1350206/BBC-propaganda-machine-climate-c...

Nickbat wrote on 25. Jan 2011 at 10:07:


Here are some facts for you, Lizzie:

"In just the past 500 years, Greenland warming/cooling temperatures fluctuated back and forth about 40 times, with changes every 25-30 years (27 years on the average)."

Greenland temperatures over the past 25,000 years recorded in the GISP 2 ice core show strong, abrupt warming depicted by nearly vertical rise of temperatures, strong cooling by nearly vertical drop of temperatures.

"The largest magnitudes of warming/cooling events per century over the past 25,000 years. At least three warming events were 20 to 24 times the magnitude of warming over the past century and four were 6 to 9 times the magnitude of warming over the past century. The magnitude of the only modern warming which might possibly have been caused by CO2. (1978-1998) is insignificant compared to the earlier periods of warming."

Professor Don J. Easterbrook, Dept. of Geology, Western Washington University, 24 January 2011.

Oh, and while we're about it, that chart is not "in isolation" as you put it. It shows the loss (in thousands) of surface stations occurred at the same time as the surface temperature records started to rise. That is a fact. I think I'm entitled to be sceptical.

Incidentally, the Parliamentary Sci-Tech Committe released a report at midnight on the climategate inquiries:

"Graham Stringer, a Labour MP on the Committee, said there are questions over how the scientists chose the figures they used to back up the case for global warming."

“It does not say this is the end of the scientific case for global warming but it does say that people at the centre of this research did some very bad science,” he said."

“It is not a whitewash, it is the establishment looking after their own. They are not looking hard enough at what went wrong.”

As the only member of the committee with a science background, is Mr Stringer entitled to be a tad sceptical as well?

and if you dont believe that man kind, cant change the climate, here is a simple example.. my city's surrounding mountains are covered with thick snow in the last 2 months , but not even a tiny piece of snow dropped onto the city ..

You don't need any scientists whatsover to know that the sheer presence of a tripled world population within my Dads lifetime IS having a detrimental effect on the world and its climate.

Try this experiment at home and become a scientist. Stick 20 people in your living room and you will soon spot the temperature rise particularly if they are using their Ipods, making hot drinks, farting or just talking hot air. There you are now a fully qualified scientist.

It really makes me laugh how a whole section of society makes a living out of pretending that our inflated unatural presence on Earth may or may not be causing issues. Mankind is truly pathetic.

I'll stick with NASA for now