This is the old site. Please use the new site.

  Welcome, Guest. Please Login
Omega Owners Forum
 
  Home Shop Help Search Members Login  
 

This is the old site. Please use the new site.

www.omegaowners.com/forum/index.php.

 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
new airgun law (Read 4802 times)
Desperate Den
Omega King
********
Offline



Posts: 11881
Re: new airgun law
Reply #30 - 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32
 
Lazydocker wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:22:


That's the one LD Thumbs Up!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Guffer
Omega Lord
*******
Offline


Music to watch girls by....

Posts: 6142
Hampshire
Gender: male

Drives: R Reg 2.5V6 Omega ELITE & P reg Omega 2.5 V6 CDX
Re: new airgun law
Reply #31 - 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32
 
tunnie wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:16:
I could do with an air-gun actually, take out the pigeons on the roof opposite


A tongue in cheek comment Tunnie I know  Thumbs Up!

But the other laws on airgun usage are quite clear: 

- You must have the land-owners permission to use an airgun. 
- The pellets cannot leave the boundaries of that land.
- You cannot shoot over a public right of way
- You cannot shoot within a 50 feet of a public right of way.

Shooting ettiquette, some of these are covered by cruelty laws:

- Ensure that the weapon is properly zeroed
- Ensure the weapon is suitable for the task.  ie you have enough power (muzzle velocity) for the type and size of animal you are to dispatch.
- Ensure you are not too far away so as to cause the pellet to loose sufficient power.
- Ensure you are able to dispatch the animal with a clean and accurate shot so as to cause minimum distress to the animal.
- Follow-up each shot animal as soon as possible so as to ensure quick dispatch.

Oh, and who mentionned rabbit pie? mmmmmmmm Tongue
Back to top
 

RIP Lisa, you will be missed Cry
mrgaffney  
IP Logged
 
Lazydocker
Omega King
********
Offline


Victim of Pinky's Power
Trip!

Posts: 11336
Woodbridge, Suffolk
Gender: male

Drives: 2003 3.2 Elite Estate LPG Converted, inspected and Certified
Re: new airgun law
Reply #32 - 04. Feb 2011 at 09:36
 
Guffer wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32:
tunnie wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:16:
I could do with an air-gun actually, take out the pigeons on the roof opposite


A tongue in cheek comment Tunnie I know  Thumbs Up!

But the other laws on airgun usage are quite clear: 

- You must have the land-owners permission to use an airgun. 
- The pellets cannot leave the boundaries of that land.
- You cannot shoot over a public right of way
- You cannot shoot within a 50 feet of a public right of way.

Shooting ettiquette, some of these are covered by cruelty laws:

- Ensure that the weapon is properly zeroed
- Ensure the weapon is suitable for the task.  ie you have enough power (muzzle velocity) for the type and size of animal you are to dispatch.
- Ensure you are not too far away so as to cause the pellet to loose sufficient power.
- Ensure you are able to dispatch the animal with a clean and accurate shot so as to cause minimum distress to the animal.
- Follow-up each shot animal as soon as possible so as to ensure quick dispatch.

Oh, and who mentionned rabbit pie? mmmmmmmm Tongue


Yummy! Have it quite frequently actually... The Rabbits are a real issue around here and, fortunately, I live on a private estate Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up!
Back to top
 

Whatever it is... I didn't do it
Lazydocker  
IP Logged
 
Guffer
Omega Lord
*******
Offline


Music to watch girls by....

Posts: 6142
Hampshire
Gender: male

Drives: R Reg 2.5V6 Omega ELITE & P reg Omega 2.5 V6 CDX
Re: new airgun law
Reply #33 - 04. Feb 2011 at 09:37
 
Desperate Den wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32:
Lazydocker wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:22:


That's the one LD Thumbs Up!


Interesting, as I have no kids in my house I wonder if just leaving it in an unlocked cupboard would be suitable?  No kids have access to my house so keeping the doors locked when I am out should be sufficient according to that link?
Back to top
 

RIP Lisa, you will be missed Cry
mrgaffney  
IP Logged
 
tunnie
Over Active Poster
*********
Offline



Posts: 22520
London, W3
Gender: male

Drives: 2.2 CD (LPG'd) & BMW R1200 GS
Re: new airgun law
Reply #34 - 04. Feb 2011 at 09:43
 
Guffer wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32:
tunnie wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:16:
I could do with an air-gun actually, take out the pigeons on the roof opposite


A tongue in cheek comment Tunnie I know  Thumbs Up!

But the other laws on airgun usage are quite clear: 



Shooting ettiquette, some of these are covered by cruelty laws:


Interesting, cheers for that. In my case:

- You must have the land-owners permission to use an airgun. 

Could easily be arranged, Pigeons are known to be a pest, and the managment company of the building don't want them. Nor do Orange/T-Mobile/O2 who rent the roof.

- The pellets cannot leave the boundaries of that land.

This is the only stumbler point, I guess they could easily leave

- You cannot shoot over a public right of way

If I shot in direction of the shops yes, but, behind the flats the land is owned by Network Rail, so I can shoot in that direction!

- You cannot shoot within a 50 feet of a public right of way.

Does that include a vertical 50ft? I am on the 5th floor of 6.
Back to top
 

Do you break V6's as often as TheBoy? Then you need tunnie's towing services, recovery costs are just the humiliation of being towed by 2/3's of an engine
 
IP Logged
 
Guffer
Omega Lord
*******
Offline


Music to watch girls by....

Posts: 6142
Hampshire
Gender: male

Drives: R Reg 2.5V6 Omega ELITE & P reg Omega 2.5 V6 CDX
Re: new airgun law
Reply #35 - 04. Feb 2011 at 09:46
 
Just spoke to the Home Office and he directed me to this HO Circular on the new law:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/home-office-circulars/circulars-2011/004-2...
Back to top
 

RIP Lisa, you will be missed Cry
mrgaffney  
IP Logged
 
Lazydocker
Omega King
********
Offline


Victim of Pinky's Power
Trip!

Posts: 11336
Woodbridge, Suffolk
Gender: male

Drives: 2003 3.2 Elite Estate LPG Converted, inspected and Certified
Re: new airgun law
Reply #36 - 04. Feb 2011 at 09:48
 
Guffer wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:37:
Desperate Den wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32:
Lazydocker wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:22:


That's the one LD Thumbs Up!


Interesting, as I have no kids in my house I wonder if just leaving it in an unlocked cupboard would be suitable?  No kids have access to my house so keeping the doors locked when I am out should be sufficient according to that link?


I was having the same thoughts... It doesn't actually say it must be kept locked up, just out of the way of children Undecided Undecided

Won't change how mine is kept though... I know it's safe that way Wink
Back to top
 

Whatever it is... I didn't do it
Lazydocker  
IP Logged
 
Guffer
Omega Lord
*******
Offline


Music to watch girls by....

Posts: 6142
Hampshire
Gender: male

Drives: R Reg 2.5V6 Omega ELITE & P reg Omega 2.5 V6 CDX
Re: new airgun law
Reply #37 - 04. Feb 2011 at 09:52
 
tunnie wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:43:
Guffer wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32:
tunnie wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:16:
I could do with an air-gun actually, take out the pigeons on the roof opposite


A tongue in cheek comment Tunnie I know  Thumbs Up!

But the other laws on airgun usage are quite clear: 



Shooting ettiquette, some of these are covered by cruelty laws:


Interesting, cheers for that. In my case:

- You must have the land-owners permission to use an airgun. 

Could easily be arranged, Pigeons are known to be a pest, and the managment company of the building don't want them. Nor do Orange/T-Mobile/O2 who rent the roof.

- The pellets cannot leave the boundaries of that land.

This is the only stumbler point, I guess they could easily leave

- You cannot shoot over a public right of way

If I shot in direction of the shops yes, but, behind the flats the land is owned by Network Rail, so I can shoot in that direction!

- You cannot shoot within a 50 feet of a public right of way.

Does that include a vertical 50ft? I am on the 5th floor of 6.


I think in your situation you would need a vermin control certificate and even then the preference would be to use deterence rather than shooting in this instance.
Back to top
 

RIP Lisa, you will be missed Cry
mrgaffney  
IP Logged
 
cem
Omega King
********
Offline



Posts: 13920
Ankara/Turkey
Gender: male

Drives: 97 2.5 V6 Manual CD- Clio Sport
Re: new airgun law
Reply #38 - 04. Feb 2011 at 09:57
 
geoffr70 wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 00:58:
They are fire arms. I have seen the damage so called pests can do, and yes I bloody would question their use as pest control thanks very much. Like I said it's their planet aswell. We arrogant humans seem to think it's acceptable to kill animals for our own convenience.

Have I been shooting? Are you having a laugh? I've fired more guns than I care to remember. I can strip them blindfolded and re-assemble them after cleaning and oiling them. I've shot and been shot at, and not for retarded blood thirsty 'sport' reasons either, thinly veiled as pest control or not.

Look, I can do a smiley face aswell Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up!

Edit to add

Incidentally, when pests try and destroy all my crops, I don't bloody shoot them. So to that end, how do you justify shooting innocent animals who are trying to get food for themselves and their young?



Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up! Thumbs Up!

I also have an air.. and see what damage it makes on wood and other things.. Shocked extremely dangerous .. ( I didnt know before I buy) and must never be used on animals..
Back to top
 
cem  
IP Logged
 
Desperate Den
Omega King
********
Offline



Posts: 11881
Re: new airgun law
Reply #39 - 04. Feb 2011 at 10:01
 
Guffer wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:37:
Desperate Den wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32:
Lazydocker wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:22:


That's the one LD Thumbs Up!


Interesting, as I have no kids in my house I wonder if just leaving it in an unlocked cupboard would be suitable?  No kids have access to my house so keeping the doors locked when I am out should be sufficient according to that link?


I think the question of safe custody may come in here G.

Any firearm (including air weapons) must be secured when not in use (sensibly).

In the event or any holder leaving a firearm in those circumstances I would imagine that the Firearms Certificate would be revoked.

Where the circumstances involved a person under the age of 18 unlawfully breaking into your premises and discovering the unsecured weapon (irrespective of the offences he/she/it commits) then the amended S 46 could apply to the holder of the weapon 'permitting' by way of not securing it. (In the generally accepted sense of the legislation)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Entwood
Omega King
********
Offline


Quietly Confident

Posts: 13708
North Wiltshire
Gender: male

Drives: 3.2 Elite (with LPG)
Re: new airgun law
Reply #40 - 04. Feb 2011 at 10:12
 
Guffer wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:37:
Desperate Den wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32:
Lazydocker wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:22:


That's the one LD Thumbs Up!


Interesting, as I have no kids in my house I wonder if just leaving it in an unlocked cupboard would be suitable?  No kids have access to my house so keeping the doors locked when I am out should be sufficient according to that link?


Given the new directive .. you would have to argue, in court, the "reasonableness" of your decision.

The new directive does NOT stipulate how you must secure the weapon .. in fact it is at pains NOT to do so ..

Quote:
2.  Section 46 inserts a new section 24ZA into the Firearms Act 1968, which makes it an offence for a person in possession of an air weapon to fail to take reasonable precautions to prevent someone under the age of 18 from gaining unauthorised access to it.......


and

Quote:
6.  The new offence requires people to take ‘reasonable precautions’ to prevent unauthorised access to an air weapon by young persons aged under 18. What will constitute ‘reasonable precautions’ will depend on the particular circumstances in each individual case and it is therefore not possible to be prescriptive. However, the simple steps set out below are a useful starting point. ......


I actually think some common sense may (?) have crept into the drafting of this legislation


In your example .. it could be argued that the kids would just have to break a window to access the weapon, so the precautions were not reasonable. If the weapon was also in a locked cupboard then more reasonable precautions had been taken .

Don't know .. would need to be argued in court.
Back to top
« Last Edit: 04. Feb 2011 at 10:17 by Entwood »  

V6 Cam locking/setting kit, Maxscan GS500 OBDII code reader/EML resetter available.   Click for some Pictures
 
IP Logged
 
Guffer
Omega Lord
*******
Offline


Music to watch girls by....

Posts: 6142
Hampshire
Gender: male

Drives: R Reg 2.5V6 Omega ELITE & P reg Omega 2.5 V6 CDX
Re: new airgun law
Reply #41 - 04. Feb 2011 at 10:14
 
Desperate Den wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 10:01:
Guffer wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:37:
Desperate Den wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:32:
Lazydocker wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:22:


That's the one LD Thumbs Up!


Interesting, as I have no kids in my house I wonder if just leaving it in an unlocked cupboard would be suitable?  No kids have access to my house so keeping the doors locked when I am out should be sufficient according to that link?


I think the question of safe custody may come in here G.

Any firearm (including air weapons) must be secured when not in use (sensibly).

In the event or any holder leaving a firearm in those circumstances I would imagine that the Firearms Certificate would be revoked.

Where the circumstances involved a person under the age of 18 unlawfully breaking into your premises and discovering the unsecured weapon (irrespective of the offences he/she/it commits) then the amended S 46 could apply to the holder of the weapon 'permitting' by way of not securing it. (In the generally accepted sense of the legislation)


I have wondered that too Zulu  Undecided

Also, even though an FAC is not required for an air weapon rated below 12 ft/lbs muzzle velocity I think should you be found wanting of this and you had an FAC as well you may risk losing it
Back to top
« Last Edit: 04. Feb 2011 at 10:18 by Guffer »  

RIP Lisa, you will be missed Cry
mrgaffney  
IP Logged
 
Desperate Den
Omega King
********
Offline



Posts: 11881
Re: new airgun law
Reply #42 - 04. Feb 2011 at 10:50
 
Guffer wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 10:14:
I have wondered that too Zulu  Undecided

Also, even though an FAC is not required for an air weapon rated below 12 ft/lbs muzzle velocity I think should you be found wanting of this and you had an FAC as well you may risk losing it


Yes G, even though the prime legislation doesn't seem to prescribe how weapons are secured in these circumstances. (That I can find anyway)

Home Office advice, as interpreted and applied by the Chief Officer of any relevant constabulary (through local Firearms officers) appears to the operative factor when controlling the issue of certificates and control of weapons held by members of the public.

I would think it's a case of Entwood's common sense being the governing factor - sensibly, as individual circumstances will always vary.

And yes, should an unsecured air weapon fall into the hands of someone under the age of 18 (relevant to the op) or indeed any person (who used it in prohibited circumstances), then I would imagine that if the holder of that weapon held other weapons on a Firearm Certificate the local FO would certainly look at the holders suitability to continue holding weapons.
Back to top
« Last Edit: 04. Feb 2011 at 13:01 by Desperate Den »  
 
IP Logged
 
scimmy_man
Intermediate Member
***
Offline



Posts: 395
yorkshire
Gender: male

Drives: mv6 scimitar A3 discovery
Re: new airgun law
Reply #43 - 04. Feb 2011 at 12:47
 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Martin Imber
Over Active Poster
*********
Offline


LPG Omega V6 - Keyfobs
Rebuilt

Posts: 20110
Worcester
Gender: male

Drives: 2001 Omega 2.6CD LPG & 3.0 cams
Re: new airgun law
Reply #44 - 04. Feb 2011 at 15:22
 
tunnie wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:29:
Lazydocker wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:23:
tunnie wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 09:16:
Guffer wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 05:55:
geoffr70 wrote on 04. Feb 2011 at 01:18:
My blood pressure isn't rising. I'm superfit! So shall I take that as 'no, you can't justify killing innocent animals'?


I take it you're a vegetarian then?  Ever been to an abatoir?


Indeed, whats the difference between shooting a cow with a gun (would never see it coming)

Or electrocuting it in an abatoir, with them all lined up in a queue?

I could do with an air-gun actually, take out the pigeons on the roof opposite


You'd have issues though as you would be breaking the law on several counts Wink


I did some checking, I need the permission of the landlord in which the building/house the pigeons are.

There is a notice in my flat lobby saying not to feed them, as they are pests/rodents. I suspect it would be easy to get approval to shoot them  Smiley



Pigeons don't have teeth Tunnie
Back to top
 

The other tuned 2.6. DIY LPG, towbar, upgrade ICE & Wing Spoiler, Air shocks, Eibach Pro Springs, Poly WB bushes, WIM setup, HID conversion, 3.0 cams, ported ect.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print

This is the old site. Please use the new site.