This is the old site. Please use the new site.

  Welcome, Guest. Please Login
Omega Owners Forum
 
  Home Shop Help Search Members Login  
 

This is the old site. Please use the new site.

www.omegaowners.com/forum/index.php.

 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
petrol usage (Read 2732 times)
Hogi
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 1

Drives: 1999 omega
petrol usage
08. Sep 2011 at 16:25
 
Hi All,
I am new to this site and new to Omegas.
I an thinking about buying a 1999 ("T" reg) omega estate with a 2 litre 16 valve engine and would like to know what  fuel consumption I can expect.
Cheers
Hogi
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Andy B
Over Active Poster
*********
Offline



Posts: 21988
Bury Lancs
Gender: male

Drives: 1999 3.0 Elite auto/TDM
Re: petrol usage
Reply #1 - 08. Sep 2011 at 16:51
 
[quote author=2B0C040A630 link=1315495506/0#0 date=1315495506]Hi All,
I am new to this site and new to Omegas.
I an thinking about buying a 1999 ("T" reg) omega estate with a 2 litre 16 valve engine and would like to know what  fuel consumption I can expect.
Cheers
Hogi[/quote]

I don't & have never owned a 2000 litre, but don't fall into the trap of buying a smaller engined car for better fuel consumption. An Omega is a heavy car & a 2.0 will struggle compared with a V6.
My consumption varies between 21/22mpg around town to 32/33 on a run on the motorway, but if you drive them hard around town don't be surprised if you get high teens mpg  :-? :-? :y
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Osprey
Senior Member
****
Offline


Drink up. The world's
about to end.

Posts: 513
Redhill, Surrey
Gender: male

Drives: 2.6 Elite saloon
Re: petrol usage
Reply #2 - 08. Sep 2011 at 17:29
 
I used to have a 1993 2.0 Carlton (Omega A) and I would say the consumption was just as pisspoor the same as my current 2.6. 

I used to get 33mpg at best on a run, low 20s around town driving carefully.  There are only a couple of real differences I have noticed.  The 2.0 returns best mileage at 60mph whereas the 2.6 is best at 70 to 80mph, which is useful on motorways.  Also, you can push the mileage right down into the teens on the 2.6 by driving briskly whereas you can't drive the 2.0 briskly at all.
  Cheesy
Back to top
 

I feel like a military academy. Bits of me keep passing out.
 
IP Logged
 
cem
Omega King
********
Offline



Posts: 13920
Ankara/Turkey
Gender: male

Drives: 97 2.5 V6 Manual CD- Clio Sport
Re: petrol usage
Reply #3 - 08. Sep 2011 at 17:51
 
+1 to whats said above..

omega is a heavy car and its weight and gear ratios mostly detemines fuel consumption..

imo go for a v6  manual.. 
Back to top
« Last Edit: 08. Sep 2011 at 17:58 by cem »  
cem  
IP Logged
 
Abiton
Omega Knight
*****
Offline



Posts: 1064
Under Bonnet, nr Abingdon
Gender: male

Drives: Mk2 Golf, but the missus has a '96 2.0 'Select' woohoo!
Re: petrol usage
Reply #4 - 08. Sep 2011 at 17:53
 
2.0 manual will be the most economical (Edit: petrol) Omega, if driven with economy in mind.  Not sure if there's any diff between saloon/estate, guess the estate is even heavier, so possibly worse, depending on how the aero differences work out.

It's still disappointing though.  Mass of car is the problem.  Engine size relatively irrelevant, except that the more powerful engines will tend to be used at higher powers, so worse on economy.

Autos worse than manuals.
Back to top
« Last Edit: 08. Sep 2011 at 18:23 by Abiton »  

People are just about as happy as they have a mind to be.
Abraham Lincoln
 
IP Logged
 
duggs
Omega Knight
*****
Offline



Posts: 1072
Felixstowe
Gender: male

Drives: 2000 3.0 V6 ELITE
Re: petrol usage
Reply #5 - 08. Sep 2011 at 19:13
 
You WILL be disappointed with a 2.0...

You'll soon love the Omega...but very soon after will wish you had a couple of more cylinders.

Stick with a V6
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
dbug
Omega Lord
*******
Offline


Dont knock Linux!

Posts: 7822
Northants
Gender: male

Drives: 98 V6 Elite auto
Re: petrol usage
Reply #6 - 08. Sep 2011 at 19:21
 
[quote author=6F404A57716C2E0 link=1315495506/1#1 date=1315497092]
I don't & have never owned a 2000 litre, but don't fall into the trap of buying a smaller engined car for better fuel consumption. An Omega is a heavy car & a 2.0 will struggle compared with a V6.
My consumption varies between 21/22mpg around town to 32/33 on a run on the motorway, but if you drive them hard around town don't be surprised if you get high teens mpg  :-? :-? :y[/quote]

2000 Litre - you'll need to tow a tanker to feed a monster that size !!!!
Back to top
« Last Edit: 08. Sep 2011 at 19:26 by dbug »  

...1998 Elite 2.5V6 Auto, 1967 Triumph TR4A, 1998 Elite 2.5V6 Auto Estate
WWW  
IP Logged
 
TheBoy
Administrator
****************
Offline


TBE has an MOT!

Posts: 64817
Brackley, Northants
Gender: male

Drives: 98 MV6, 03 Elite, 00 25, 89 ZX10
Re: petrol usage
Reply #7 - 08. Sep 2011 at 19:53
 
It its all motorway, expect mid/high 30s MPG from a 2.0/2.2 manual. Expect almost similar from a 2.5 manual.
Back to top
 

If you are going to kick a car, remember to wear appropriate footwear
Any posts are the result of my own views as a member of OOF, which may or may not be the same as my views as part of the Admin Team.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Andy B
Over Active Poster
*********
Offline



Posts: 21988
Bury Lancs
Gender: male

Drives: 1999 3.0 Elite auto/TDM
Re: petrol usage
Reply #8 - 08. Sep 2011 at 19:55
 
[quote author=6C6A7D6F080 link=1315495506/6#6 date=1315506117] ....
2000 Litre - you'll need to tow a tanker to feed a monster that size !!!![/quote]

Just testing to see if you were paying attention  ;) ;) ;)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freecall666
Senior Member
****
Offline


fun for all, get with
the program

Posts: 656
looking over your shoulder
Gender: male

Drives: 2.0I polar sea blue
Re: petrol usage
Reply #9 - 08. Sep 2011 at 20:54
 
at petrol price £1.33.9 its £32 for 208miles on mine.
Back to top
 

doit your self (DIY)
 
IP Logged
 
danzigfan
Intermediate Member
***
Offline



Posts: 260
Jesenice, Slovenia
Gender: male

Drives: Omega 2.0i 16v sport
Re: petrol usage
Reply #10 - 08. Sep 2011 at 21:02
 
Go for 2,5/2,6 I would / will asap (mine 2.0 consumption is from 34mpg min to 15 max in town)
Back to top
« Last Edit: 08. Sep 2011 at 21:07 by danzigfan »  

I would rather push omega than drive renault
stanislav.glogovsek  
IP Logged
 
Captain Slower
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 31
Reading, Berkshire
Gender: male

Drives: 2000 Reg MV6 3.0 Estate
Re: petrol usage
Reply #11 - 08. Sep 2011 at 21:29
 
I have a 3.0 MV6 estate (auto)
Most of my driving is motorway and I get anywhere from 34 - 39 mpg and thats with a load onboard. Having said that, I dont ever put the pedal into the carpet whilst accelerating. I've always found the bigger engines give a better return in bigger cars, never had anything smaller than 2.5 L in an estate or saloon. my 2.8 beemer will return 40mpg on the motorway.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tigers_gonads
Omega Knight
*****
Offline


can't spell, don't care
!!

Posts: 1450
hull
Gender: male

Drives: omega 3.0  v6 cd manual estate
Re: petrol usage
Reply #12 - 08. Sep 2011 at 23:17
 
My old 2.5 manual estate used to get 28 mpg with aboot full of cable and tools round town  Thumbs Up!

About 33 mpg on a run  Thumbs Up!

The worst I got over a 7 mile run down a B road was 9.4 mpg  Roll Eyes Grin Grin Grin

At the end of the day, the omega weighs close to 2 ton so a small engine is going to have to be worked pretty hard to move it along so go for a V6  Wink

All V6 manuals are within 2 or 3 mpg of each other  Thumbs Up!
Auto's round town are down into the teens   Sad
Back to top
« Last Edit: 08. Sep 2011 at 23:18 by tigers_gonads »  
 
IP Logged
 
Bob G
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 79
Gloucester
Gender: male

Drives: 2.0 L GLS X Reg
Re: petrol usage
Reply #13 - 08. Sep 2011 at 23:33
 
Circumstances led to buying a 2.0L and so far i am happy, I must be lucky as I find it very quick off the mark and after my 3.0L Cosworth Scorpio it is nice not to have to watch the fuel gauge.

Each to their own, i am happy with mine. Cool
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sehen
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 35
Norway, up north...

Drives: 98 Omega2,5 V6 Saloon
Re: petrol usage
Reply #14 - 08. Sep 2011 at 23:42
 
Before my conversion to V6, I ran the 2.0 with auto for 3 months, and with the same speed, same car, in the twists and upphills in northern Norway, the V6 and manual, used 1.0 litres LESS then the 2,0 auto pr/100km. But in the city, it's very close between the 2,0 auto and the V6 manual. But it's more fun with the V6, even the 2,5/2,6 compared to the 2,0.
Enough said Thumbs Up!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print

This is the old site. Please use the new site.